The decision-making process of VAR in football has become a topic of controversy, marked by scrutiny and accusations. Some have resorted to sharing conspiracy theories and questioning the technology, particularly following an offside decision that disallowed a potential winning goal.

However, it is important to acknowledge that the decision was correct and there was no failure in the technology; rather, it is the misinterpretation of blurry pictures that has led to misunderstandings. The introduction of semi-automated offsides in the upcoming season is expected to improve decision-making.

However, it is crucial not to baselessly question VAR’s technical aspects or influence due to personal biases. Furthermore, public figures such as former referee Mark Clattenburg have been criticized for their remarks and actions, which have sparked embarrassment and controversy.

Specifically, an incident involving referee Stuart Attwell has prompted unwarranted implications and accusations, indicating a growing trend of suspicion towards referees and VARs. This trend has led to unfounded allegations and club statements that contribute to an unhealthy and unfair environment.

Several instances, including controversial calls in matches involving Liverpool and Arsenal, have magnified the need for a more measured and fair approach towards referees and VAR. It is essential to allow referees and technology a fair chance and halt the escalating distrust and criticism.

Overall, the football community should strive to exhibit more maturity and understanding in their interactions with referees and VAR. It is important to refrain from perpetuating baseless accusations and support a more respectful and constructive approach towards decision-making in football.